Andrew Sullivan wonders why we haven't been attacked since 9/11. Here is my e-mail to him:
What amazes me about the analysis of why “we” haven’t been attacked since 9/11, is the limit of what “we” means. No, the US hasn’t been attacked, but Spain, Great Britain, Indonesia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and probably more, have been attacked. It is a fallacy to think the Islamofascists are at war only against the US. They are at war against the modernist way of thinking. So “we” have been attacked.
Why has the US not been attacked on its own soil? Hard to tell. But don’t start thinking that the pause is somehow a first-time happening. Remember that between the two attacks on the World Trade Center, seven years went by with no Islamofascist attack on our soil. I am still waiting for the great outpouring of thanks to Bill Clinton for his ability to protect us. And perhaps the admission that, given Clinton’s Bush-like record defending the homeland, torture and warrantless wiretapping are not necessary.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Why "We" Haven't Been Attacked
Posted by Peter at 11:15 AM
Labels: Andrew Sullivan, Terrorism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment